[PATCH] D17381: [Polly] [RFC] Fine-grain dependency analysis
Hongbin Zheng via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 25 08:31:43 PST 2016
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
> grosser added a comment.
> Hi ether,
> I do not think that there is a need to factor this into another pass. In
> fact, I think for the state we are currently at, the 'flag' solution works
> well as it shows what can be done and allows us to test the functionality.
> If we later need this functionality (simultaneously) in different passes,
> we can always refactor to make it easier accessible. From my point of view,
> this patch is good to go. However, I would suggest to add a reference-type
> test case.
> Also, if you are interested to eliminate - based on this patch - the
> reduction dependence detection. This would be of great value.
I can think about this. We can discuss this latter
> rL LLVM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits