[PATCH] D16857: More detailed memory dependence checking between volatile and non-volatile accesses

Nick Lewycky via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 22 22:08:08 PST 2016

nicholas added a subscriber: nicholas.
nicholas added a comment.

Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:

> kparzysz added a comment.


> Philip, Nick---could you please review this?

It looks correct to me, but please wait for Philip.

I wish there were a testcase which demonstrated that two non-aliasing 
volatile accesses were dependent, but I don't see any way to write that 
test (maybe you can add more debug print statements to MemDep).




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list