[PATCH] D16857: More detailed memory dependence checking between volatile and non-volatile accesses
Nick Lewycky via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 22 22:08:04 PST 2016
Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
> kparzysz added a comment.
> Philip, Nick---could you please review this?
It looks correct to me, but please wait for Philip.
I wish there were a testcase which demonstrated that two non-aliasing
volatile accesses were dependent, but I don't see any way to write that
test (maybe you can add more debug print statements to MemDep).
More information about the llvm-commits