[PATCH] D15328: [x86][avx512] more changes in intrinsics to be align with gcc format

[Craig Topper via llvm-commits]

The stance I had always taken was that if clang and gcc both have a builtin
for something we match them. If clang doesn't need a builtin and gcc does
then we just don't match.

On Thursday, December 10, 2015, Elena Demikhovsky via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> delena added a subscriber: delena.
> delena added a comment.
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> We did not complete the SKX intrinsics yet. We are adding them to the
> backend and to the clang. And we still have a lot of work to do.
> The names and parameters should be the same in GCC and in Clang headers.
> The current patch is just a minor fix.
> Could you, please, explain your point?
>
> - Elena
>
> From: Eric Christopher [mailto:echristo at gmail.com <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 20:23
> To: reviews+
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15328+public+c78cb0b2afbde1c2@reviews.llvm.org;
> Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com <javascript:;>>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] http://reviews.llvm.org/D15328: [x86][avx512] more
> changes in intrinsics to be align with gcc format
>
> Why again? We're already not compatible because we don't handle, nor do we
> want to, other builtins.
>
> -eric
>
>
> Repository:
>   rL LLVM
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15328
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>


-- 
~Craig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151210/4e2caa8c/attachment.html>