[llvm] r239162 - [bpf] rename triple names bpf_be -> bpfeb

[Eric Christopher]

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:

>
> > On 2015-Jun-05, at 10:18, Alexei Starovoitov <
> alexei.starovoitov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
> >> If we're going to change suffixes to try to pick ones which make sense
> to be
> >> consistent with going forward, I would prefer we pick ones which
> actually
> >> make sense.
> >
> > imo bpf_be and bpf_le were more readable.
> >
> > ... let the bikeshedding  continue... :)
>
> I know nothing of the history here (and I'm terrible at naming things)
> but if it turns out there isn't really a proper precedent, I agree
> that the _{b,l}e names are more obvious and readable.
>
>
There's some pretty good precedent here as I pointed out in my original
mail on the subject.

-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150605/d90b3da8/attachment.html>