[PATCH] [MC] Implement support for R_X86_64_SIZE64
david.majnemer at gmail.com
Mon Mar 2 23:35:07 PST 2015
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7990#133275, @majnemer wrote:
> Seems a little over specific, it would be nice if we could handle `R_386_SIZE32` and `R_X86_64_SIZE32` as well.
Arg, this feedback isn't very helpful. Sorry about that. I guess what I tried to communicate was that we should have a `VK_SIZE` instead of `VK_X86_64_SIZE` and let the fixup's kind govern whether we get ``R_X86_64_SIZE32` or ``R_X86_64_SIZE64`.
More information about the llvm-commits