[PATCH] Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
mehdi.amini at apple.com
Mon Mar 2 10:21:37 PST 2015
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 9:40 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Few small comments:
> a) You've got Function::getDataLayout - I think I'd prefer people to generally have to ask the Function parent to get the data layout. (It's also a little inconsistent in the code, but should be fairly sed'able).
Not sure I understand what you mean. Are you saying that getDataLayout() should be available on the module only?
Note: I haven’t added this, there is a getDataLayout() in Instruction, BasicBlock, and GlobalValue.
It saves some space when the only thing you have is an instruction:
> b) Routines to construct a data layout (Totally a follow up patch) in llvm rather than requiring each front end to handle construct them up themselves.
> c) Relatedly you don't do anything about the code in the backends that constructs the data layouts?
I haven’t touch the backend yet, I plan on reworking this when I’m done with the IR-level.
More information about the llvm-commits