[llvm] r215224 - Delete dead code. NFC.

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at google.com
Mon Aug 11 08:59:08 PDT 2014


This is probably a tangent from the primary discussion here...

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am of the opinion that LLVM vends a general compiler framework, but
> not a general file or object library for example. Those exist for
> LLVM's own use.
>

If there are folks interested in our object libraries being more fully
general, and willing to help maintain them as such, I'm not actually
opposed to it. Personally, I can see utility in our having reasonably
generic object libraries available. I'm not saying we should support this
without folks stepping up to keep it well maintained and tested, just
saying that I wouldn't personally rule it out either.

-Chandler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140811/3d90ba24/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list