[llvm] r202486 - [docs] Add a big section with details about how to go about acquiring

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 13:14:26 PST 2014

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:

> > Because Clang/LLVM 3.4 don't provide an installed-out-of-the-box well
> > tested standard library implementation for Linux, and as mentioned
> > at the start of the comment section, this is largely a Linux
> > section.
> So the issue is just that libc++'s build system is wacky? I've never built
> libc++ with cmake -- preferring instead my patched version of the 'buildit'
> script ;) -- , but is the cmake setup from 3.4 usable? Or is testing on
> Linux the major issue?

The build setup with cmake is getting better, but not perfect yet. The
testing on linux is also an issue. I think these are *all* show stopper
problems for recommending this as the one stop host toolchain on Linux.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140304/777857b2/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list