[PATCH] XCore target: add support to build MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Tue Mar 4 08:18:20 PST 2014

Hi Robert,

I'd rather not do this. The fact that the tests use fork() is really most
likely inappropriate for a compiler benchmark, I'd rather not put in more
support in this direction.

Why not just skip these tests for Xcore? I can tell you from experience
that Lemon is pretty worthless (most likely because of the fork() behavior).

If you really do want to use the tests, I'd rather someone put in the
effort to completely get rid of fork() in them.

 - Daniel

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:03 AM, robert lytton <robert at xmos.com> wrote:

>   Hi Daniel,
>   Could you confirm that you are happy with me moving fork() into the
> RUNUNDER script.
>   We only support hardware threads (not processes) so global data is best
> reinitialised by rerunning!
>   Robert
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2785
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140304/005d7013/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list