[PATCH] Adding diversity for security

[Per Larsen]

Thanks for getting back to us on that. Agree wholeheartedly that we should
use the C++11 RNG for now in the interest of landing the initial patch.
Stay tuned for an updated patch.

Best,
Per


On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:15 PM, JF Bastien <jfb at chromium.org> wrote:

>
>   C++11 now seems to be OK with LLVM (see
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2905). Could we start the discussion
> about using it for this patch instead of having a separate RNG?
>
>   Bikeshed *which* RNG to use, and how to use random_device and such to
> seed things, as well as being able to feed randomness for an external file
> (which Geremy suggested offline).
>
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1802
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140301/91d9d19f/attachment.html>