[PATCH] [Lit] Use multiprocessing instead of threading

[Sean Silva]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 23 October 2013 00:26, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
> > I wanted to have a little bit of time to check out how things were on
> > Windows, but I haven't found it.
> >
> > Off the top of my head, I think that was the main thing, other than also
> > just giving it a little bake time.
> >
> > We could go ahead and switch the default for non-Windows and see what
> > happens if you are interested...
>
> Probably a good idea. With check-all the time goes from  1m10.644s to
> 0m50.506s in my machine :-)
>

Wow, that means that 20s of the check-all time were just lit overhead,
which is insane. Can you estimate the total lit overhead after switching to
multiprocessing? E.g., can we gain another 20s of check-all speed by
reducing lit overhead?

-- Sean Silva


>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131024/77381ec4/attachment.html>