[llvm] r184685 - LoopVectorize: Use the dependence test utility class

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Mon Jun 24 12:00:38 PDT 2013

On 24 June 2013 13:16, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:

> In this case there might be one at distance <offset from A to B>.
> Therefore, you can vectorize as long as your <scalar access size * VF> is
> within <offset from A to B>.

Excellent! How it's supposed to be! ;)

I am not expecting many improvements. We don’t reorder accesses. Most
> impact you'll get by vectorizing parallel accesses.

No big changes detected here, either.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130624/03cdca26/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list