[llvm-commits] [PATCH] [test-suite] smallpt single source benchmark

[Jakub Staszak]

Yes, it was. You are right, sorry for the problem.

- Kuba

On Dec 20, 2012, at 6:38 PM, "Redmond, Paul" <paul.redmond at intel.com> wrote:

> My understanding is that erand48() generates reproducible results given the same initial state. The time should be stable from run to run.
> 
> Is that your concern?
> 
> paul
> 
> On 2012-12-20, at 11:58 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This benchmark contains "Monte Carlo" heuristics (note erand48() method). 
>> I'm not pretty sure if it is a good idea to run this kind of code in benchmarks.
>> 
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>> 
>> - Kuba
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2012, at 5:01 PM, "Redmond, Paul" <paul.redmond at intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> <smallpt.diff>
>> 
>