[llvm-commits] [PATCH] [test-suite] smallpt single source benchmark

[Redmond, Paul]

My understanding is that erand48() generates reproducible results given the same initial state. The time should be stable from run to run.

Is that your concern?

paul

On 2012-12-20, at 11:58 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This benchmark contains "Monte Carlo" heuristics (note erand48() method). 
> I'm not pretty sure if it is a good idea to run this kind of code in benchmarks.
> 
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
> - Kuba
> 
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 5:01 PM, "Redmond, Paul" <paul.redmond at intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> <smallpt.diff>
>