[llvm-commits] [llvm] r98666 - /llvm/trunk/test/Feature/unions.ll

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Tue Mar 16 13:56:55 PDT 2010


This was the wrong solution, (a) because I already reverted the patch,
and (b) because it doesn't make sense to XFAIL a test which only
started failing by a commit to exactly-that-which-it-is-testing.
Reverting the initial patch is more reasonable, which would also have
nicely given you a friendly svn conflict. :)

 - Daniel

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> Author: lattner
> Date: Tue Mar 16 15:08:07 2010
> New Revision: 98666
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=98666&view=rev
> Log:
> temporarily xfail
>
> Modified:
>    llvm/trunk/test/Feature/unions.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Feature/unions.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Feature/unions.ll?rev=98666&r1=98665&r2=98666&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Feature/unions.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Feature/unions.ll Tue Mar 16 15:08:07 2010
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llvm-dis > %t1.ll
>  ; RUN: llvm-as %t1.ll -o - | llvm-dis > %t2.ll
>  ; RUN: diff %t1.ll %t2.ll
> -
> +; XFAIL: *
>  %union.anon = type union { i8, i32, float }
>
>  @union1 = constant union { i32, i8 } { i32 4 }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list