[llvm-bugs] [Bug 76448] If `vmaxss` already handles NaN like `fmax`, why is `fmax` so complicated?

LLVM Bugs via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 27 07:49:07 PST 2023

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 76443] [Clang][ASTWriter] Assertion `(Value < (1u << BitsWidth)) && "Passing narrower bit width!"' failed.
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 76450] [libc++] Const valarray (g)slice, mask, etc. fail to match valarray in template functions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20231227/19b1e5c7/attachment.html>

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 76443] [Clang][ASTWriter] Assertion `(Value < (1u << BitsWidth)) && "Passing narrower bit width!"' failed.
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 76450] [libc++] Const valarray (g)slice, mask, etc. fail to match valarray in template functions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list