[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36563] Unlike GNU ld, some options do not accept --long-option=value

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 22 07:16:25 PDT 2019


https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36563

Fangrui Song <i at maskray.me> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |i at maskray.me
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray.me> ---
I'm inclined to close this as other options accept = now.
Not sure if we want to accept --lto-O 3 or --lto-O=3, because gcc/clang doesn't
accept -O 3 -O=3 either :)

For --opt-remarks-filename, maybe we can use this sentence from --chroot to
explain why it doesn't support the = variant:
// -chroot doesn't have a help text because it is an internal option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20190522/15784bfe/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list