[lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution

[Zachary Turner via lldb-dev]

I was thinking the same thing too.  I figured this was just for the interim.

Chris, did you mean to update the global LLVM style conventions?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:27 AM Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't this be made general and added to the llvm coding conventions?
> I was assuming that upon completion of this exercise, we would delete the
> lldb coding conventions doc.
>
> Jim
>
> > On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 9, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> So perhaps it would be reasonable for us to standardize on something
> like this:
> >>
> >>      • Main Module Header
> >>      • Local/Private Headers
> >>      • lldb/...
> >>      • llvm/...
> >>      • System #includes
> >
> > This makes sense to me, and matches what clang does as well.  I think
> that this is clearly in the spirit of the llvm include order standards, and
> I think it would be great to make this explicit in the coding standard
> doc.  Can you send in a patch to update it to make this explicit?  I’ll
> review it.
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> > I actually just submitted the patch.  (Sorry, itchy trigger finger or
> something).  r278373.  If you have any comments let me know and I'm happy
> to iterate on it.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20160811/4e1d9cdb/attachment-0001.html>