[lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution
Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 11 11:27:12 PDT 2016
Shouldn't this be made general and added to the llvm coding conventions? I was assuming that upon completion of this exercise, we would delete the lldb coding conventions doc.
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> So perhaps it would be reasonable for us to standardize on something like this:
>> • Main Module Header
>> • Local/Private Headers
>> • lldb/...
>> • llvm/...
>> • System #includes
> This makes sense to me, and matches what clang does as well. I think that this is clearly in the spirit of the llvm include order standards, and I think it would be great to make this explicit in the coding standard doc. Can you send in a patch to update it to make this explicit? I’ll review it.
> I actually just submitted the patch. (Sorry, itchy trigger finger or something). r278373. If you have any comments let me know and I'm happy to iterate on it.
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the lldb-dev