[lldb-dev] bindings as service idea

Todd Fiala via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 18 22:58:05 PST 2015

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Zachary,
> I think the time pressure has gotten the better of me, so I want to
> apologize for getting snippy about the static bindings of late.  I am
> confident we will get to a good solution for removing that dependency, but
> I can certainly wait for a solution (using an alternate approach in our
> branch) until we arrive at something more palatable to everyone.
> Regarding the bindings as service idea:
> How quickly do you think you could flesh out the bindings as a service
> idea?  With a relatively strong dislike for the static approach I'm taking,
> I can back off that and just use my current code here in a downstream
> branch for now.  Ultimately I want to remove the requirement for swig, but
> I can probably achieve that without doing it in upstream if we're going to
> have some solution there at some point ideally sooner than later.
> Also - I think you were going to send me a swig 3.x binding to try out
> (I'd need the LLDBWrapPythoh.cpp and the lldb.py, and you'd just need to
> let me know if it still needs to be post-processed or it would need to be
> done).  Can we shoot for trying that out maybe tomorrow?
Hey I got these, Zachary.  They just didn't go in my inbox.

> Thanks!
> --
> -Todd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151118/c12fd72a/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list