[lldb-dev] mind if I try allowing reruns on arm/aarch64?

Todd Fiala via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 17 10:39:42 PST 2015

(And, as an aside, I may just nuke the serial test runner anyway, since we
can do it with a multi-worker runner with a single worker just fine, and
reduce the code size --- I really don't see a good reason to keep the
serial test runner strategy anymore except for a purely theoretical sense).

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ying,
> I am speculating that the rerun logic issue where we saw the hang may be
> more of a serial test runner issue.  Would you mind if I re-enabled the
> arm/aarch64 inclusion in the rerun logic now that I made a change based on
> this speculation?  It would be a relatively quick way to check if the
> serial test runner is the issue, since now the rerun logic will not use the
> serial test runner but rather the normal parallel runner with a single
> worker (so, the same intent but expressed another way, using the test
> runners we use all the time).  If we still hit the issue, it is unrelated
> to the serial test runner strategy.  If we don't see the issue, then: (1)
> great, we have a solution, and (2) I know I need to look into the serial
> test runner strategy which may need some updates for recent changes.
> How does that sound?  If I enable it and it times out, I'll just revert
> the change and we'll go back to normal.  (And I'll know more about the
> issue, albeit with more investigation necessary).  If it works just fine,
> we'll leave it this way (and I'll know I need to look into the serial test
> runner).
> --
> -Todd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151217/a01a50e9/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list