[lldb-dev] Linux: "doesn't contain the architecture x86_64"

[Todd Fiala]

FWIW - I just tried this on Ubuntu 14.04 with a build at r213575 (earlier
today):

tfiala at tfiala2:/mnt/ssd/work/macosx.sync/mbp-git/build-debug$ bin/lldb
(lldb) file /bin/ls
Current executable set to '/bin/ls' (x86_64).
(lldb) run
Process 20313 launching
Process 20313 launched: '/bin/ls' (x86_64)
Process 20313 stopped
* thread #1: tid = 20313, 0x00007fdaa88d42d0, name = 'ls', stop reason = trace
    frame #0: 0x00007fdaa88d42d0
error: No such process
2014-06-29-23_22_22  CMakeFiles               examples          rules.ninja
2014-06-29-23_22_40  cmake_install.cmake      include           share
bin                  CPackConfig.cmake        lib               test
build.ninja          CPackSourceConfig.cmake  lldb-test-traces  tools
cmake                docs                     LLVMBuild.cmake   unittests
CMakeCache.txt       DummyConfigureOutput     projects          utils
Process 20313 exited with status = 0 (0x00000000)
(lldb)

That seemed to work, but is Ubuntu 14.04 vs. 12.04.

-Todd
​


On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:

> Can you send me your /bin/ls?  (Direct send to me, might need to .tar.gz
> it).  I can see if we're identifying it correctly at the object file level.
>
> With recent platform additions, we may have borked something.
>
> Have you tried running the tests on your end?  There are a few tests in
> test/functionalities/object-file that will verify if we're parsing the
> object files correctly.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Keno Fischer <
> kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>> This is on
>>
>> 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-61-generic x86_64)
>>
>> I started a bisect. I can confirm that this worked on Feb 28 (I chose
>> that arbitrarily for the start of the bisect), so it must have broken since.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Keno,
>>>
>>> Which Linux distribution and bitness (64/32) are you on?
>>>
>>> I've seen similar behavior when platforms or object files
>>> inappropriately identify (or mis-identify) which files they can do
>>> something with.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Keno Fischer <
>>> kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just rebuilt lldb on a linux machine (usually I'm on mac), and I'm
>>>> seeing this (for all programs on the machine). Has anybody seen this
>>>> before (before I dive into debugging)?
>>>>
>>>> >usr/bin/lldb /bin/ls
>>>> error: '/bin/ls' doesn't contain the architecture x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Keno
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>  Todd Fiala | Software Engineer |  tfiala at google.com |  650-943-3180
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer |  tfiala at google.com |  650-943-3180
>



-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140721/558b32c4/attachment.html>