[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D30698: Resubmit "Use LLVM for all stat related calls"

[Zachary Turner via lldb-commits]

=============
Issue Details
=============
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_and_run_command_dwarf
(lang/c/register_variables/TestRegisterVariables.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_and_run_command_dwo
(lang/c/register_variables/TestRegisterVariables.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_dwarf
(functionalities/thread/exit_during_break/TestExitDuringBreak.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_dwo
(functionalities/thread/exit_during_break/TestExitDuringBreak.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_lldbmi_gdb_set_target_async_off
(tools/lldb-mi/TestMiGdbSetShow.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_lldbmi_process_output
(tools/lldb-mi/syntax/TestMiSyntax.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_lldbmi_settings_set_target_run_args_after
(tools/lldb-mi/interpreter/TestMiInterpreterExec.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_multiple_debuggers_dwarf
(api/multiple-debuggers/TestMultipleDebuggers.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_process_interrupt_dwo
(functionalities/thread/state/TestThreadStates.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_sb_api_listener_resume_dwarf
(api/multithreaded/TestMultithreaded.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_sb_api_listener_resume_dwo
(api/multithreaded/TestMultithreaded.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_with_dwarf (lang/cpp/printf/TestPrintf.py)
UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_with_dwo (lang/cpp/printf/TestPrintf.py)

===================
Test Result Summary
===================
Test Methods:       1905
Reruns:                0
Success:            1203
Expected Failure:    117
Failure:               0
Error:                 0
Exceptional Exit:      0
Unexpected Success:   13
Skip:                572
Timeout:               0
Expected Timeout:      0

I can't seem to run unittests because I'm getting undefined references to
editline which I haven't dug into, but the regular tests pass.

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:47 PM Pavel Labath via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> labath accepted this revision.
> labath added a comment.
> This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
>
> OK, let's give this another shot. (I haven't tried it on linux yet, so if
> you haven't either then let's wait until tomorrow, or maybe @eugene could
> try it out (?)). I don't think we need to be worried about symlink
> overwrite in the ModuleCache test.
>
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h:500
> +/// @param result Set to true if \a path is a directory (after following
> +///               symlinks, false if it is not. Undefined otherwise.
>  /// @returns errc::success if result has been successfully set, otherwise
> a
> ----------------
> missing closing paren here
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D30698
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20170307/827969b1/attachment.html>