[cfe-dev] Clang Static Analyzer Question about Plists

Paul Anderson via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 17 19:43:37 PST 2019


If you're building automation, I highly encourage you to consider using 
the new Sarif output format.



On 1/16/2019 3:45 PM, Trevor Huang via cfe-dev wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am Trevor Huang, a student at University of Pennsylvania and one of 
> my classmates, Gianluca Gross, recently asked some questions about 
> Clang Static Analyzer for our senior design project. He forwarded us 
> some responses from Alexey Sidorin and Gabor Horvath, so thank you so 
> much for the assistance!
> One recommendation given to help us in our project is to use the plist 
> output from scan-build instead of the html output for our parsing. I 
> was looking through the contents of the plist and found that 
> statements such "Taking true branch," and other statements in the bug 
> trace that are in gray (instead of yellow) in the html report does not 
> appear to be present in the plist format. I was wondering where those 
> statements come from and if there is an easy way for me to include 
> them if I only read the plist output.
> Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you again!
> Sincerely,
> Trevor
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

Paul Anderson, VP of Engineering, GrammaTech, Inc.
531 Esty St., Ithaca, NY 14850
Tel: +1 607 273-7340 x118; http://www.grammatech.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20190117/81ca158f/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list