[cfe-dev] "Automatic explicit" template instantiation?

[Marcus Johnson via cfe-dev]

I see, I totally misread that, sorry for the confusion.

I thought you were trying to optimze how long it takes to compile Clang
it's self.

On Monday, January 7, 2019, Bouman, N.J. <n.j.bouman at tue.nl> wrote:

>
> > On 7 Jan 2019, at 05:37, Marcus Johnson <bumblebritches57 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I haven't contributed to Clang yet, and I'm not familiar with IBM's
> anything really, but I feel like your proposal is beating around the bush a
> bit.
> >
> > In my opinion, Clang is too deeply coupled and adheres too closely to
> the OOP style.
> >
> > […]
> >
> > My point is that Clang's abstraction layers aren't broken down in the
> correct places, and it could use some serious refactoring.
> >
> >
>
> I might have been unclear, but by “heavily templated code” I was referring
> to *user code*, not to Clang’s codebase.
>
> So my question is about an optional compiler feature, provided to users of
> the compiler, instead of suggesting to refactor Clang’s codebase.
>
> Kind regards,
> Niek
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20190107/76b12310/attachment.html>