[cfe-dev] Patch review archives from 2012

Kristóf Umann via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 19 17:00:55 PST 2018


Okay, I'll ask specifics.

I've spent the better part of last week familiarizing myself with
MallocChecker's code in order to eventually split it up (which has been a
surprisingly pleasant experience!). In the process of learning how it
works, I'm adding doxygen comments to every non-trivial method and
non-trivial hackery, from what I can gather from old cfe-dev threads and
bug reports.
To me it isn't clear what ReallocPair[1] (added by this[2] commit) does. I
can come up with some ideas, but I don't have a grasp on it at all, sadly.
The very cryptic boolean out-parameter ReleasedAllocated[3], related to
[1], doesn't help this case either. It was added by this[4] commit, but I'm
still struggleing to understand what's the happening here.

[1]
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp#L141
[2]
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/c8bb3befcad8cd8fc9556bc265289b07dc3c94c8
[2]
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp#L341
[3]
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/55dd956d521d4d650dfd929d67f4b98ede61c0ea


Artem Dergachev <noqnoqneo at gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov. 20., K,
1:43):

> Back then Static Analyzer was developed almost exclusively by the first
> generation of Analyzer developers which was a small team at Apple, none
> of which are still active Analyzer developers. I guess they didn't
> really need that much open documentation when they could simply look at
> each other's monitor and discuss things on a whiteboard. These days the
> community is much bigger (and i'm much more of a masochist who does not
> feel happy to just sit down and write code, and actively prevents others
> from doing the same, so that everybody knew the taste of code review
> pain), so Phabricator turned out to be a spot-on tool.
>
> But you should ask around for specific things. It might be that people
> have already managed to re-discover the motivation behind certain
> solutions.
>
> On 11/19/18 3:57 PM, Kristóf Umann via cfe-dev wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Where can I find design discussions and patch reviews similar to
> > reviews.llvm.org <http://reviews.llvm.org>, but from 2012? There are a
> > variety of commits to some files I'm working with in the Static
> > Analyzer that could use more explanation. I didn't have any luck
> > reading through the cfe-dev and cfe-commits archives.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kristóf Umann
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20181120/10af8db3/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list