[cfe-dev] Clang Static Analyzer Feature Bounties

[Jonas Toth via cfe-dev]

Hi,

no. I dont have any major position, i would just potentially benefit
from the bounties :P

I dont know who has the power to decide about financial questions, but
the LLVM deciders are most likely involved in it!

All the best, Jonas :)


Am 02.03.2018 um 23:21 schrieb Benjamin Bales:
> Hi Jonas!
>
> Nice to hear from you.  We could certainly add clang-tidy to our
> roadmap.  The primary reason we are interested in improving the clang
> static analyzer is because we build our commercial product, CodeAI
> (www.mycode.ai), on top of it.  I am hiring an internal work force to
> enhance the checkers, but I am interesting in exploring open source
> alternatives to push forward this work.  I have some ideas, but I
> think it would be best if we could arrange a phone call next week
> sometime to discuss things.  Are you the maintainer of this project?
>
> -Ben
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Jonas Toth via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> nice to hear! Would you consider clang-tidy as second part of clangs
>> static analysis framework as worthwhile, too?
>>
>> All the best, Jonas
>>
>>
>> Am 02.03.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Benjamin Bales via cfe-dev:
>>> Greetings Clang Front End Developers!
>>>
>>> My name is Benjamin Bales, and I am the CTO and co-founder of
>>> QbitLogic, a startup company in Atlanta.  We are interested in
>>> sponsoring feature bounties to further develop the clang static
>>> analyzer.  Can someone recommend me a point of contact with whom I can
>>> open a dialogue? Let me know.  Thanks!
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>