[cfe-dev] clang-cl: missing code coverage when exception handling is enabled

David Blaikie via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 23 07:52:21 PDT 2018

What do you mean by "won't work" - in the sense that a function that has
exceptions enabled but no exception path is tested won't have full
coverage? That seems arguably correct/useful?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 4:58 PM Jan Kokemüller via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm trying to use gcov based code coverage analysis with clang-cl
> targeting Windows.
> Currently this won't work for functions where exceptions might be thrown:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D38223
> Any pointers to what is needed to fix this? The approach discussed in
> the linked review and related bug reports didn't seem to work out.
> -Jan
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180423/3dd49250/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list