<div dir="ltr">What do you mean by "won't work" - in the sense that a function that has exceptions enabled but no exception path is tested won't have full coverage? That seems arguably correct/useful?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 4:58 PM Jan Kokemüller via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
I'm trying to use gcov based code coverage analysis with clang-cl<br>
targeting Windows.<br>
Currently this won't work for functions where exceptions might be thrown:<br>
<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D38223" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D38223</a><br>
<br>
Any pointers to what is needed to fix this? The approach discussed in<br>
the linked review and related bug reports didn't seem to work out.<br>
<br>
-Jan<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>