[cfe-dev] clang 3.5 branching and clang-openmp merge

Jack Howarth howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 10:14:22 PDT 2014


Nico,
     So basically branching for 3.5 completely terminates the process of
merging the clang-omp changes. It is unfortunate that llvm seems to have a
rather disorganized process for merging trees like clang-omp. It would have
been nice to see some level of coordination to get that committed cleanly
rather than a piecemeal fashion over multiple llvm releases.
         Jack


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jack Howarth <
> howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nico,
>>     A simple review of cfe-commits mailing list archive for the past
>> couple of months shows that Alexey Bataev has been regularly committing
>> sections of the clang-omp merge so it really isn't true to say that nothing
>> has landed in trunk yet.
>>
>
> Oh sure, anything that was committed by yesterday is part of 3.5. I think
> Bill understood your question as "We landed this bit of code very recently
> that we'd like to merge", but from what I understand it's more "there's a
> largeish chunk of code in some upstream repo". I don't think Bill meant to
> say that all that unmerged code should just be merged to 3.5 :-)
>
>
>> It is unfortunate that the clang-omp changes were never submitted as a
>> complete series of patches on the mailing list so only the clang-omp
>> developers have a good sense of what remains to be committed from their
>> tree.
>>           Jack
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jack,
>>>>
>>>> Please go ahead and merge those changes into the 3.5 release.
>>>
>>>
>>> They aren't landed yet on trunk, as far as I understand.
>>>
>>>
>>>> There’s still time before we close the branches to non-bug fix changes.
>>>>
>>>> -bw
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:25 AM, Jack Howarth <
>>>> howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >      Is the merge of the clang-omp changes being abandoned for the
>>>> 3.5 release or will these additional changes to trunk also be allowed into
>>>> the clang 3.5 branch? If official clang 3.5 release is left with only a
>>>> partial merge of these changes, it would seem to require upstream to pause
>>>> and rebase their clang-omp tree on clang 3.5 instead of the current clang
>>>> 3.4 (to allow for a stable release of clang-omp to be available based on
>>>> clang 3.5).
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is probably correct, yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>> >              Jack
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > cfe-dev mailing list
>>>> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140722/47a4559a/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list