[cfe-dev] Recovering the unqualified class name from a function parameter

[Victor Vicente de Carvalho]

That managed to remove the const and the reference type, but when I try to
use the "getAsString" method it returns to me "class Type". I could
manually remove the "class  " part, just to know if there is a way to do in
a non hackish way.


Thanks


2012/11/2 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>

> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Victor Vicente de Carvalho
> <victor.v.carvalho at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying without success to recover the unqualified name for a type
> while
> > parsing a CXXMethodDecl. The first problem is that the Type class doesn't
> > have a getNameAsString, or getAsString. The second problem is that even
> > getting the unqualified type and dumping it still resolves to qualified
> > types.
> >
> > Suppose I have a parameter on a function named as "const ClassType& x":
> >
> > all of those:
> >  (*param)->getType()->getUnqualifiedDesugaredType()->dump();
> >  (*param)->getType().getUnqualifiedType()->dump();
> >  (*param)->getType()->dump();
> >
> > returns const ClassType &identifier when dumping.
>
> Try (*param)->getType().getNonReferenceType().getUnqualifiedType().dump() .
>
> -Eli
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20121102/424c4c24/attachment.html>