[cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY)
mikael at lyngvig.org
Mon Jun 18 05:04:18 PDT 2012
Thanks for your feedback!
I will include the official MinGW64 site - and then drop the Drangon site
for now. I simply had trouble finding the executables because I was
looking for a 64-bit build of MinGW64, but apparently it is only officially
supported as a 32-bit build. Perhaps my problems with Clang++ and MinGW64
will go away once I try out the official channels :-)
Is it okay if we switch so I mention TortoiseSVN instead of SlikSVN then?
I am desperately trying to keep the doc as simple as possible.
I used to have a section on that, but the annoying thing is that in MinGW32
it is called mingw32-make.exe and in MinGW64 it is called make.exe.
Perhaps we should simply wait to check in the document until such a time
that Ninja on Windows is officially supported by CMake? Kitware posted a
note saying that CMake now supports Ninja on Windows in the CMake test
suite so it will be part of the next release of CMake. I think it would be
very sad to have to cover three different build tools because then the
document ends up being almost as complex as it was before I split out the
test and buildbot slave stuff. And GNU Make seems to have a problem with
that it is not utilizing the CPU 100 percent (even when -jN is specified,
where N is the number of cores or twice that number), whereas Ninja has no
problems with this.
No problem, it is the least I can do since I don't feel knowledgable enough
about LLVM and Clang to actually code on them. I plan to spend quite some
time converting existing HTML documents verbatim into Sphinx later on.
> Generally, I think this looks very good! A few nit-picks:
> 1. You should probably list the somewhat-more-popular mingw64
> distributions available from: http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/
> 2. You may want to mention TortoiseSVN as an alternative to SlikSVN,
> as that seems to be a popular choice
> 3. As much as I like Ninja, I would add a section on mingw32-make as
> that is the only "official" build choice at the moment ("official" meaning
> supported by CMake developers)
> Thanks for working on this!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev