<div class="gmail_quote"><div>Thanks for your feedback!</div><div><br></div><div>I will include the official MinGW64 site - and then drop the Drangon site for now. I simply had trouble finding the executables because I was looking for a 64-bit build of MinGW64, but apparently it is only officially supported as a 32-bit build. Perhaps my problems with Clang++ and MinGW64 will go away once I try out the official channels :-)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Is it okay if we switch so I mention TortoiseSVN instead of SlikSVN then? I am desperately trying to keep the doc as simple as possible.</div><div><br></div><div>I used to have a section on that, but the annoying thing is that in MinGW32 it is called mingw32-make.exe and in MinGW64 it is called make.exe. Perhaps we should simply wait to check in the document until such a time that Ninja on Windows is officially supported by CMake? Kitware posted a note saying that CMake now supports Ninja on Windows in the CMake test suite so it will be part of the next release of CMake. I think it would be very sad to have to cover three different build tools because then the document ends up being almost as complex as it was before I split out the test and buildbot slave stuff. And GNU Make seems to have a problem with that it is not utilizing the CPU 100 percent (even when -jN is specified, where N is the number of cores or twice that number), whereas Ninja has no problems with this.</div>
<div><br></div><div>No problem, it is the least I can do since I don't feel knowledgable enough about LLVM and Clang to actually code on them. I plan to spend quite some time converting existing HTML documents verbatim into Sphinx later on.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Generally, I think this looks very good! A few nit-picks:</div><div><ol><li>
You should probably list the somewhat-more-popular mingw64 distributions available from:
<a href="http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/</a></li><li>You may want to mention TortoiseSVN as an alternative to SlikSVN, as that seems to be a popular choice</li><li>As much as I like Ninja, I would add a section on mingw32-make as that is the only "official" build choice at the moment ("official" meaning supported by CMake developers)</li>
</ol><div>Thanks for working on this!</div></div><div><br></div></div></blockquote></div>