[cfe-dev] What is the status of clang-based service architecture?

[Manuel Klimek]

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 07/12/12 08:44, Manuel Klimek wrote:
>
>> The first step is to make clang (more) thread-safe:
>> For example, the file interface is not thread-safe; this requires
>> changes to the file system / path interface to allow keeping state of
>> the working directory, and doing all relative file operations based on
>> that state (on unix fd* versions of the unix file api). This requires an
>> objectification of the file interface first, which requires some more
>> design work.
>>
>
> In your opinion, could libclang be used as the backend of a clang-based
> service or is just too constrained functionality-wise?


See the original proposal:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2012-June/022028.html

Cheers,
/Manuel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20121207/9a226aec/attachment.html>