[cfe-dev] proposal: every warning should have a -W flag

[Ted Kremenek]

On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:28 PM, David Blaikie wrote:

> I wasn't necessarily suggesting numbers themselves - we could stick
> with names, but mostly my question was about "should we identify each
> separate diagnostic" or is "every diagnostic must be part of at least
> one group" the requirement we're aiming for? 

I was specifically proposing that…

(a) every warning is part of a group

and

(b) every group that contains a warning that can only be activated by that group maps to a -W flag
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20110809/82d7e39c/attachment.html>