[cfe-dev] Question about -Wreadonly-setter-attrs
csdavec at swansea.ac.uk
Tue Jul 28 08:19:46 PDT 2009
I disagree on this one. -Wreadonly-setter-attrs warns that you have
written something that may be redundant. This is pedantic. In
contrast, -Wundeclared-selector warns that you have written something
that may be generating code that will corrupt your stack. This is
important. Pedantic warnings should not be in the default set,
important ones should.
On 28 Jul 2009, at 16:10, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
> Agreed. There are two of them that I would like to remove them from -
> Wmost. The other being -Wundeclared-selector.
> - Thanks, Fariborz
> Please remove them
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>> I have a question about Wreadonly-setter-attrs ( property attributes
>> 'readonly' and 'retain' are mutually exclusive ). I don't think it
>> should be enabled by standard warning flags (Wmost, Wall).
>> It does not really make sense as declaring a readonly property as
>> retain or copy is a common and legal practice. It's even required if
>> you want to be able to use property re-declaration as defined here:
>> And so, when this flag is on, it produce a lots of spurious warning
>> There may be situation where you want to use it (even if I don't see
>> one yet), but I think it should only be part of an "extra-extra"
>> warning group and should not be part of common warnings (-Wmost ? )
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the cfe-dev