[cfe-dev] Static analysis and Adium

Ted Kremenek kremenek at apple.com
Mon Jul 7 08:32:12 PDT 2008

Hi Todd,

BTW, after I sent my last email, I realized that you may have been  
referring to the table on the Adium wiki:


This table was not produced by the static analysis tool.

The tool itself produces an index.html (not shown) that contains a  
table of warnings whose columns can be sorted with a mouse click.   
That table has a less polished look than the one in the wiki.  If you  
are interested in getting the static analysis results on Adium where  
you can sort the results, you can easily just rerun the tool.

If anyone is interested in making the tool's output more polished,  
patches are certainly welcome.  I don't pretend to be an HTML guru.


On Jul 7, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote:

> Hi Todd,
> The table of results should already be sortable by column.  Is this
> not working for you?  We use the sorttable.js script found at:
>   http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/
> This only works if the sorttable.js is in the same directory as the
> index.html that lists the set of warnings (scan-build copies this file
> over by default).
> Ted
> On Jul 7, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Todd Ransom wrote:
>> I would like to see the output sorted by source file. For instance,
>> if MyClass.m has 5 memory leaks reported then these leaks should all
>> be next to one another so I don't have to hunt back and forth
>> between files. And/or you could make the table of results sortable
>> by column.
>> Todd Ransom
>> StoryMill & Montage Development
>> Mariner Software
>> On Jul 6, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
>>> On Jul 4, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Holger Schurig wrote:
>>>>> dereferences. Beyond improving the precision of the analyzer,
>>>>> improving its output is also high on the todo list. (so any
>>>>> suggestions are welcome!)
>>>> Add links to descriptions. E.g., when who first visits this page
>>>> sees "Dead store on ...". I can imagine that only a few people
>>>> know what a dead store actually is.
>>> Agreed.  That's an excellent suggestion.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20080707/64d16b12/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list