[clang] nonblocking/nonallocating attributes (was: nolock/noalloc) (PR #84983)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -5028,3 +5050,376 @@ void AutoType::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const ASTContext &Context) {
   Profile(ID, Context, getDeducedType(), getKeyword(), isDependentType(),
           getTypeConstraintConcept(), getTypeConstraintArguments());
 }
+
+FunctionEffect::Kind FunctionEffect::oppositeKind() const {
+  switch (kind()) {
+  case Kind::NonBlocking:
+    return Kind::Blocking;
+  case Kind::Blocking:
+    return Kind::NonBlocking;
+  case Kind::NonAllocating:
+    return Kind::Allocating;
+  case Kind::Allocating:
+    return Kind::NonAllocating;
+  case Kind::None:
+    return Kind::None;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+StringRef FunctionEffect::name() const {
+  switch (kind()) {
+  case Kind::NonBlocking:
+    return "nonblocking";
+  case Kind::NonAllocating:
+    return "nonallocating";
+  case Kind::Blocking:
+    return "blocking";
+  case Kind::Allocating:
+    return "allocating";
+  case Kind::None:
+    break;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+bool FunctionEffectDiff::shouldDiagnoseConversion(
+    QualType SrcType, const FunctionEffectsRef &SrcFX, QualType DstType,
+    const FunctionEffectsRef &DstFX) const {
+
+  switch (EffectKind) {
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::NonAllocating:
+    // nonallocating can't be added (spoofed) during a conversion, unless we
+    // have nonblocking
+    if (DiffKind == Kind::Added) {
+      for (const auto &CFE : SrcFX) {
+        if (CFE.Effect.kind() == FunctionEffect::Kind::NonBlocking)
+          return false;
+      }
+    }
+    [[fallthrough]];
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::NonBlocking:
+    // nonblocking can't be added (spoofed) during a conversion.
+    switch (DiffKind) {
+    case Kind::Added:
+      return true;
+    case Kind::Removed:
+      return false;
+    case Kind::ConditionMismatch:
+      return true; // TODO: ???
+    }
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::Blocking:
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::Allocating:
+    return false;
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::None:
+    break;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+bool FunctionEffectDiff::shouldDiagnoseRedeclaration(
+    const FunctionDecl &OldFunction, const FunctionEffectsRef &OldFX,
+    const FunctionDecl &NewFunction, const FunctionEffectsRef &NewFX) const {
+  switch (EffectKind) {
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::NonAllocating:
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::NonBlocking:
+    // nonblocking/nonallocating can't be removed in a redeclaration
+    switch (DiffKind) {
+    case Kind::Added:
+      return false; // No diagnostic.
+    case Kind::Removed:
+      return true; // Issue diagnostic
+    case Kind::ConditionMismatch:
+      // All these forms of mismatches are diagnosed.
+      return true;
+    }
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::Blocking:
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::Allocating:
+    return false;
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::None:
+    break;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+FunctionEffectDiff::OverrideResult
+FunctionEffectDiff::shouldDiagnoseMethodOverride(
+    const CXXMethodDecl &OldMethod, const FunctionEffectsRef &OldFX,
+    const CXXMethodDecl &NewMethod, const FunctionEffectsRef &NewFX) const {
+  switch (EffectKind) {
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::NonAllocating:
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::NonBlocking:
+    switch (DiffKind) {
+
+    // If added on an override, that's fine and not diagnosed.
+    case Kind::Added:
+      return OverrideResult::NoAction;
+
+    // If missing from an override (removed), propagate from base to derived.
+    case Kind::Removed:
+      return OverrideResult::Merge;
+
+    // If there's a mismatch involving the effect's polarity or condition,
+    // issue a warning.
+    case Kind::ConditionMismatch:
+      return OverrideResult::Warn;
+    }
+
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::Blocking:
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::Allocating:
+    return OverrideResult::NoAction;
+
+  case FunctionEffect::Kind::None:
+    break;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+bool FunctionEffect::canInferOnFunction(const Decl &Callee) const {
+  switch (kind()) {
+  case Kind::NonAllocating:
+  case Kind::NonBlocking: {
+    FunctionEffectsRef CalleeFX;
+    if (auto *FD = Callee.getAsFunction())
+      CalleeFX = FD->getFunctionEffects();
+    else if (auto *BD = dyn_cast<BlockDecl>(&Callee))
+      CalleeFX = BD->getFunctionEffects();
+    else
+      return false;
+    for (const FunctionEffectWithCondition &CalleeEC : CalleeFX) {
+      // nonblocking/nonallocating cannot call allocating
+      if (CalleeEC.Effect.kind() == Kind::Allocating)
+        return false;
+      // nonblocking cannot call blocking
+      if (kind() == Kind::NonBlocking &&
+          CalleeEC.Effect.kind() == Kind::Blocking)
+        return false;
+    }
+  }
+    return true;
+
+  case Kind::Allocating:
+  case Kind::Blocking:
+    return false;
+
+  case Kind::None:
+    break;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+bool FunctionEffect::shouldDiagnoseFunctionCall(
+    bool Direct, ArrayRef<FunctionEffect> CalleeFX) const {
+  switch (kind()) {
+  case Kind::NonAllocating:
+  case Kind::NonBlocking: {
+    const Kind CallerKind = kind();
+    for (const auto &Effect : CalleeFX) {
+      const Kind EK = Effect.kind();
+      // Does callee have same or stronger constraint?
+      if (EK == CallerKind ||
+          (CallerKind == Kind::NonAllocating && EK == Kind::NonBlocking)) {
+        return false; // no diagnostic
+      }
+    }
+    return true; // warning
+  }
+  case Kind::Allocating:
+  case Kind::Blocking:
+    return false;
+  case Kind::None:
+    break;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unknown effect kind");
+}
+
+// =====
+
+void FunctionEffectsRef::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID) const {
+  const bool HasConds = !Conditions.empty();
+
+  ID.AddInteger(size() | (HasConds << 31u));
+  for (unsigned Idx = 0, Count = Effects.size(); Idx != Count; ++Idx) {
+    ID.AddInteger(Effects[Idx].toOpaqueInt32());
+    if (HasConds)
+      ID.AddPointer(Conditions[Idx].expr());
+  }
+}
+
+void FunctionEffectSet::insert(FunctionEffect Effect, Expr *Cond) {
+  // lower_bound would be overkill
+  unsigned Idx = 0;
+  for (unsigned Count = Effects.size(); Idx != Count; ++Idx) {
+    const auto &IterEffect = Effects[Idx];
+    if (IterEffect.kind() == Effect.kind()) {
+      // It's possible here to have incompatible combinations of polarity
+      // (asserted/denied) and condition; for now, we keep whichever came
+      // though this should be improved.
+      return;
----------------
Sirraide wrote:

I do think this should be diagnosed; no-one in their right mind is going to write `foo() [[clang::blocking]] [[clang::nonblocking]]`, of course, but I feel like this might happen if templated code and/or type aliases are involved.

Seeing as I’ve suggested moving this class into Sema anyway, since at least your comment states  that it’s only used there, it should be straight-forward to diagnose this once that’s done.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983