[PATCH] D91051: [clangd] Improve clangd-indexer performance

[Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

sammccall added a comment.

This seems like an accuracy/latency tradeoff in an environment where... it's not clear why we care about latency very much. Do we?

OTOH, how useful is it to have a static index that's more accurate if it's going to be shadowed by a dynamic index for the files you care most about.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91051/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91051