[PATCH] D86465: [analyzer][solver] Redesign constraint ranges data structure

Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 26 04:54:25 PDT 2020


martong added a comment.

In D86465#2238379 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465#2238379>, @vsavchenko wrote:

> Here are some benchmarking results. 
> In docker:
> F12777445: tiny.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777445>
> F12777444: small.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777444>
> Natively on my Mac (no memory measurements due to this issue <https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/1791> during `psutil` installation):
> F12777471: tiny-native.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777471>
> F12777472: small-native.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777472>

These are really promising figures, nice work! (And the measurement stuff itself is also a great addition, thanks for that!)
Not that it would matter much, but I was just wondering why there is a slightly bigger memory usage in some of the `docker/small` projects? The most conspicuous is `oatpp`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list