[PATCH] D69351: Improve Clang's getting involved document and make it more inclusive in wording.

[Chandler Carruth via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

chandlerc marked 2 inline comments as done.
chandlerc added a comment.

Thanks, updated.



================
Comment at: clang/www/get_involved.html:113
+
+  <li>A high-quality implementation: The implementation must fit well into
+  Clang's architecture, follow LLVM's coding conventions, and meet Clang's
----------------
klimek wrote:
> Perhaps: a standard-conforming implementation?
Sadly, that goes further than this is trying to go.

While this may be a bit vague, we do at least clarify the particular things we are looking for afterward. Better words are welcome if anyone comes up with them of course.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69351/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69351