[PATCH] D69088: [Lex] #pragma clang transform

[Michael Kruse via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Meinersbur added a comment.

In D69088#1714020 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69088#1714020>, @hsaito wrote:

> Personally, I like the intent. I don't foresee a clear (enough) path to get there. This leads to hesitation of adding a new non-experimental pragma and present it to programmers. If you call it experimental, it's easier for me to swallow.


Is there anything more to do than mentioning as being it experimental in the (no-patch-available-yet) docs?


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69088/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69088