r357557 - [analyzer] When failing to evaluate a __builtin_constant_p, presume it's false.

Artem Dergachev via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 2 18:53:40 PDT 2019


Author: dergachev
Date: Tue Apr  2 18:53:40 2019
New Revision: 357557

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=357557&view=rev
Log:
[analyzer] When failing to evaluate a __builtin_constant_p, presume it's false.

__builtin_constant_p(x) is a compiler builtin that evaluates to 1 when
its argument x is a compile-time constant and to 0 otherwise. In CodeGen
it is simply lowered to the respective LLVM intrinsic. In the Analyzer
we've been trying to delegate modeling to Expr::EvaluateAsInt, which is
allowed to sometimes fail for no apparent reason.

When it fails, let's conservatively return false. Modeling it as false
is pretty much never wrong, and it is only required to return true
on a best-effort basis, which every user should expect.

Fixes VLAChecker false positives on code that tries to emulate
static asserts in C by constructing a VLA of dynamic size -1 under the
assumption that this dynamic size is actually a constant
in the sense of __builtin_constant_p.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60110

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp?rev=357557&r1=357556&r2=357557&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp Tue Apr  2 18:53:40 2019
@@ -100,17 +100,25 @@ bool BuiltinFunctionChecker::evalCall(co
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_constant_p: {
     // This must be resolvable at compile time, so we defer to the constant
     // evaluator for a value.
+    SValBuilder &SVB = C.getSValBuilder();
     SVal V = UnknownVal();
     Expr::EvalResult EVResult;
     if (CE->EvaluateAsInt(EVResult, C.getASTContext(), Expr::SE_NoSideEffects)) {
       // Make sure the result has the correct type.
       llvm::APSInt Result = EVResult.Val.getInt();
-      SValBuilder &SVB = C.getSValBuilder();
       BasicValueFactory &BVF = SVB.getBasicValueFactory();
       BVF.getAPSIntType(CE->getType()).apply(Result);
       V = SVB.makeIntVal(Result);
     }
 
+    if (FD->getBuiltinID() == Builtin::BI__builtin_constant_p) {
+      // If we didn't manage to figure out if the value is constant or not,
+      // it is safe to assume that it's not constant and unsafe to assume
+      // that it's constant.
+      if (V.isUnknown())
+        V = SVB.makeIntVal(0, CE->getType());
+    }
+
     C.addTransition(state->BindExpr(CE, LCtx, V));
     return true;
   }

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp?rev=357557&r1=357556&r2=357557&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp Tue Apr  2 18:53:40 2019
@@ -65,19 +65,20 @@ void g(int i) {
   }
 }
 
-void test_constant_p() {
+void test_constant_p(void *ptr) {
   int i = 1;
   const int j = 2;
   constexpr int k = 3;
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(42) == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
-  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(i) == 0); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}}
+  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(i) == 0); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(j) == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(k) == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
-  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(i + 42) == 0); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}}
+  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(i + 42) == 0); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(j + 42) == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(k + 42) == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(" ") == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
-  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(test_constant_p) == 0); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}}
+  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(test_constant_p) == 0); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(k - 3) == 0); // expected-warning {{FALSE}}
   clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(k - 3) == 1); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
+  clang_analyzer_eval(__builtin_constant_p(ptr == 0)); // expected-warning {{FALSE}}
 }




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list