[PATCH] D57230: [analyzer] Toning down invalidation a bit

Sat Jan 26 11:24:01 PST 2019

xazax.hun added a comment.

In D57230#1372523 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372523>, @NoQ wrote:

> In D57230#1372488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372488>, @xazax.hun wrote:
>
> > In D57230#1372275 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372275>, @NoQ wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Do you have success reducing false positives using creduce? My problem usually is that we cannot tell if a reduction rendered a false positive into a true positive.
>
>
> False positives - no. Improvements and regressions - totally! Just run two different clangs in the creduce test and check that there's a difference in results.

Oh, I see. Great idea, I never did this. Will look into it.

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230