r226178 - PR 20146

Richard Smith richard at metafoo.co.uk
Wed Jan 21 13:50:27 PST 2015

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
<joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:04:12PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 01/21/15 12:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:45:53PM -0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> >This breaks code using "volatile void" to mark functions as no-return,
>> >an oldish GCC extension. This is still somewhat popular in old code. Do
>> >we really want to / have to create a hard error for this?
>> It did seem a very picky, but unrejected, bug report  And I'd
>> forgotten about the gcc extension you mention.  Perhaps it should be
>> a pedantic error and warning otherwise?
> That's perfectly fine with me.

Yep, an ExtWarn works for me too.

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list