r226178 - PR 20146
joerg at britannica.bec.de
Wed Jan 21 12:32:32 PST 2015
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:04:12PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 01/21/15 12:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:45:53PM -0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> >This breaks code using "volatile void" to mark functions as no-return,
> >an oldish GCC extension. This is still somewhat popular in old code. Do
> >we really want to / have to create a hard error for this?
> It did seem a very picky, but unrejected, bug report And I'd
> forgotten about the gcc extension you mention. Perhaps it should be
> a pedantic error and warning otherwise?
That's perfectly fine with me.
More information about the cfe-commits