A patch to move codegen includes into public include

[Chandler Carruth]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes. It was in reply to a statement that seemed to suggest a "design
> public API up front, then implement the whole thing" approach (not a
> "incrementally approach our use cases, carefully considering the design of
> the API at each step" approach). It seems like the "design API up front"
> approach is the exception rather than the norm in LLVM-land, so it was
> strange to see it being suggested as a preference.


Sorry, I wasn't trying to preclude an incremental approach here.

I'm saying design the API that you are adding, as you add it. That doesn't
have to be the *entire* API or the final version of the API. Each increment
should be designed with some care and thought behind it.

The proposed patch is specifically not doing *any* design of the API or
finding small increments at which the design makes sense.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140825/1cebd8a3/attachment.html>