r210340 - [PPC64LE] Implement little-endian semantics for vec_pack family
wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Jun 6 16:24:06 PDT 2014
Hal, thanks -- I've committed this as r210384. The patch essentially
looks like the whole test has changed, but very little of note actually
has. Having two different CHECK sets meant that the existing formatting
wasn't usable. For powerpc-unknown-unknown, nothing has changed. For
powerpc64-unknown-unknown, the tests work identically to
powerpc-unknown-unknown. For powerpc64le-unknown-unknown, almost all
the tests are the same, but there are changes for all of the vec_pack
and vec_mul[eo] variants.
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 11:33 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Schmidt" <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 11:32:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: r210340 - [PPC64LE] Implement little-endian semantics for vec_pack family
> > Hm, that probably isn't true. I suppose the test will "pass" by
> > producing the wrong (big-endian) code generation, so this is a
> > reasonable approach.
> > I'll look into it.
> Okay, thanks. Having the tests with the commits is almost always better, so if it is feasible, then I'd prefer it.
> Thanks again,
More information about the cfe-commits