[PATCH] First step towards adding a parent map to the ASTContext.

[Manuel Klimek]

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edwin Vane <edwin.vane at intel.com> wrote:

>
>   I don't know anything about the analyzer but it sounds like it is what
> is driving the design. For tools this all looks good if only a little
> heavy-handed. Your suggestions for improvements that would make parent map
> construction not touch the whole AST would be welcome.
>
>   Question: does MatchASTVisitor::matchesAncestorOf() need fixing to use
> the new ASTContext::getParents()?
>

Yes, and that's part of the patch. At least if I didn't mess anything up? :)


>
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D267
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130205/a016c566/attachment.html>